Why Small Home Businesses Can't Sustain on Amazon, Flipkart, and Quick Commerce Platforms
18% here, 16% there, ads on top. Where does that leave a home seller?
"I don't think you can build a brand on Amazon, which is the only way a small business can really grow." That's not a competitor's marketing line against Amazon — it's a direct quote from Apoorve Mathur, a women's-wear brand owner from Uttar Pradesh, describing his own experience selling on the platform, reported by the investigative outlet Rest of World. He isn't alone. Look closely at what small Indian sellers on Amazon, Flipkart, Meesho, and quick commerce platforms actually say about their experience, and a very consistent, very uncomfortable pattern emerges: the fees, the ad spend, and the returns are structured in a way that big brands can absorb — and small, single-person or family-run home businesses usually can't.
The commission math, laid out plainly
| Platform | Typical commission | Other seller-borne costs |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon India | ~6% to 15%+ depending on category, plus a ₹5 marketplace fee per order | Fulfillment fees, storage fees, advertising (PPC) |
| Flipkart | Around 18% commission plus fixed charges and a 2% collection fee | Advertising, return shipping costs |
| Meesho | Commission plus category-based charges | Seller typically bears return shipping cost on RTO/returns |
| Quick commerce (Blinkit, Zepto, etc.) | 18% to 28% commission | Listing fees, promotional/visibility fees |
One Flipkart seller summarized the comparison bluntly in a widely-shared post: "Flipkart has 18% commission, fixed charges, 2% fees collection charges. Amazon only has 6% commission and a small fixed charge" for the same category. Whatever the exact number on a given category on a given day, the pattern is the same across every major platform: a meaningful slice of every single sale is gone before a seller sees a rupee — and that's before advertising, storage, or return costs.
The Kashmir dry-fruit seller who sold nothing for months
Illyas Khan started a small dry-fruit packaging business in Kashmir in early 2021 and listed on Amazon almost immediately, hoping it would help him weather the Covid lockdown. He had roughly 800 boxes of walnuts and dry fruits packed and ready. He didn't receive a single order for months. He assumed it was his own mistake — he watched tutorial videos, changed his keywords, cut his prices. Nothing worked. Eventually he found the real reason: "When you search for dry fruits on Amazon, it shows you products that it owns or products that have been sponsored. Our product was buried deep in the search results for anyone to find organically."
When you search for dry fruits on Amazon, it shows you products that it owns or products that have been sponsored. Our product was buried deep in the search results for anyone to find organically.
— Illyas Khan, dry-fruit seller, Kashmir — via Rest of World
This isn't a one-off complaint. Amazon runs more than a dozen private labels in India — Amazon Basics, Solimo, Vedaka, Presto, and others — competing in the same categories as the small sellers on its own platform. A 2021 Reuters investigation alleged Amazon had used internal seller data to inform its own private-label products, and reported that Amazon's own "special merchant" arrangements (Cloudtail and Appario) accounted for as much as 35% of all sales on Amazon.in at their peak — before Amazon shut Cloudtail down amid the backlash. Industry groups now estimate that of the million-plus sellers Amazon claims in India, only 5,000 to 10,000 generate enough sales to sustain a real business on the platform.
"Between the fee and shipping, there's hardly any profit left"
Om Prakash, a furniture maker in Delhi, saw his Amazon sales quadruple in his first couple of years on the platform. Then it reversed. He told Rest of World that between a 16% platform fee and shipping costs, "there is hardly any profit left" — and that competitors were somehow selling the same swing chairs for 5,000-6,000 rupees that he needed to price at 8,000 rupees just to break even, with no visibility into how. Pravin Shaikh, who sells cosmetics under the name Gorgeous Princess Beauty Center, had early success after Amazon helped set up her digital storefront — then watched her daily orders slump to 2-3 a day, bringing in just ₹300-400.
The advertising trap: paying to lose money
Even sellers who do get visibility often find the platform's own advertising tools quietly erase their margin. One Amazon seller forum post put it starkly: a seller who spent ₹1,100 on ads earned only ₹200 in sales from that spend — meaning Amazon was paid regardless of whether the seller made or lost money on the sale. This isn't a rare misconfiguration; entire communities of Amazon sellers openly discuss being unable to get organic sales at all without paying for ads first, turning "advertising" from a growth lever into something closer to a mandatory toll just to be seen.
Returns: the cost that quietly eats everything else
On Meesho specifically, sellers report return-to-origin (RTO) and customer return rates in the 15-20% range as routine, not exceptional. One detailed seller breakdown, shared on a small-business forum, calculated it plainly: at a 20% return rate, with each return costing roughly ₹200 in reverse logistics on top of a lost margin of about ₹70 per unit, the return losses alone can wipe out the profit from four out of every five sales that don't get returned. Multiple independent sellers, posting months apart with no connection to each other, report landing on nearly identical numbers — which suggests this isn't a case of bad luck, but a structural feature of how these platforms' return policies are set up, with the cost falling on the seller by default.
Quick commerce: a different model, a similar squeeze
Quick commerce platforms like Blinkit and Zepto work differently — they typically buy inventory to stock in dark stores rather than running a pure third-party marketplace — but small brands report a similar commission range, cited at 18-28%, on top of listing and promotional visibility fees that determine whether a product even appears near the top of a search. One brand consultant described actively talking a small brand owner out of onboarding to quick commerce at all, describing the model as workable for large, well-funded brands but a losing proposition for most small ones once every fee is accounted for.
So what's the actual alternative?
None of this means e-commerce itself is broken — it means big horizontal marketplaces are optimized for scale sellers and their own private labels, not for a single home baker, crafter, or family business. The trust a home business runs on — a neighbor who already knows your food, a repeat customer who values a real relationship — gets diluted to nothing on a platform where you're one of a million sellers competing against the platform's own products for the same search result.
That's precisely the gap a hyperlocal marketplace like MyPadosi is built for: no fight against a platform's own private-label products, no advertising toll just to be seen by the ten neighbors who'd actually order from you, and no return-rate math that erases a week's profit. The trust that already exists inside a neighborhood is the entire foundation, not something you have to buy back from the platform one ad rupee at a time.
Sources
- Rest of World — Amazon in India isn't trusted by small sellers
- Reuters — Amazon's Secret Weapon in India: Documents reveal how e-commerce giant used internal data (special report)
- r/FuckFlipkart — Insanely high commission fees on Flipkart compared to Amazon
- r/indianstartups — My Experience Selling on Meesho: A Complete Disaster (With Real Numbers)
- Amazon Seller Central forum — "NOT GETTING ORDERS WITHOUT RUNNING ADS"
- Base.com — Blinkit vs Own Dark Store: quick commerce commission rates
Ready to start selling home bakers?
See how MyPadosi helps sellers in this category get discovered.
